James Petras interviewed by Ricardo Martinez Rebelion 5 July                2002 *
               
“The ‘Plan Puebla Panamá’ (PPP) is not an integration with the world market, but a subordination of Mexico and Central America to the United States and to its competitors in Europe and Asia” says the US sociologist James Petras, a professor at the University of Binghamton in New York and specialist in international development.
He confirmed that the project in the south-east                of Mexico and Central America is linked with another – the pan-continental                reach of the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA – ALCA in Spanish)                which, from 2005, will consolidate and deepen the control by Washington                of Latin America.
               
James Petras is a sharp critic of the domestic                and foreign policy of the United States of Northern America, with                its need to break commercial barriers and labour laws. The plan                is an extension of the maquiladoras towards the South, since                the industrial assembly plant project is failing and capital from                the other side of the border is fleeing towards the cheaper labour                of China.
               
“The idea of Plan Puebla Panamá                is to open up areas further south where the labour force is poorer                and more desperate, and thus competitive with that of China and                other Asian countries.
               
This project has an enormous cost for the                Mexican people since it involves government finance of a gigantic                infrastructure. Public tax proceeds will be used to construct new                roads and motorways, airports and sea ports and to extend investment                to Central America, with Mexico being the junior partner. In this                sense the PPP is not an integration with the world market, but a                subordination of Mexico and Central America to the United States                and to its competitors in Europe and Asia.
               
The social effects will be catastrophic                for small farmers and for the workers in the region who might be                given work, but under conditions of severe exploitation, worse than                could be imagined in Mexico and for a lower salary than the maquiladoras                on the northern frontier. 
               With all this Mexico will lose its capacity to manage its economy,                because this is not a Plan Puebla Panamá, but a Texas Puebla,                Los Angeles Puebla, Washington Puebla, where Puebla refers to a                capital investment, but with the export of profits."
               
What relation does the PPP have with                the US project known as Area desférico in the rest of Latin                America? 
               “The PPP comprises Central America and part of the south-east                of Mexico."
               
What conditions are necessary for the                project?
               “First, Congress approval since this is an enormous investment                by the Mexican state. Second, blocking all criticism by journalists,                academics and sections unhappy with Fox’s policy. Third, preventing                the people from demanding conditions in favour of local workers                and farmers through labour laws and limits on imports subsidised                by US captial.
               
There is also the possibility that the plan                could be implemented by presidential decree, bypassing the people’s                representatives, since we know that behind Fox are the multinationals                and the Mexican oligarchies who are struggling through an economic                crisis, and the government budget is still unresolved. If more is                extracted from the people, that is, if cuts are made in education,                social security and unemployment benefit, the promoters of the PPP                could overcome that bottleneck.
               
Another problem is whether, under the world                economic contraction, the US and its competitors are willing to                join the game. The rate of profit and the level of US investments                are low and those who want to invest abroad think that China could                offer more possibilities of success with it cheap labour force and                dictatorial state. Finally, even if the plan is implemented its                promoters will meet a strong social resistance due to the bad conditions                imposed on the poor of the south."
               
* Translated from ECOS LATIONAMERICANOS
               
Contact e-mail: gillasso@hotmail.com or emisal2000@yahoo.com